A political cartoon published September 2, 2026, shows Supreme Court justices in judicial robes and red MAGA caps gathered around Donald Trump. One justice declares in a speech bubble that the ballroom case is about my security. A hand extends papers labeled lawsuits from the side. The image comments on recent litigation involving Trump and claims of judicial security concerns tied to the case.
On July 3 2026 Jimmy Margulies depicts Donald Trump dressed as Santa Claus pushing aside the emoluments clause in favor of holiday presents. Trump sits holding a document citing the Constitution ban on government corruption while gripping a large sack marked GRIFT filled with dollar signs. The speech bubble urges forgetting the emoluments clause to pursue the Santa clause instead. The image responds to ongoing debates about presidential business dealings and foreign payments during the holiday period.
The cartoon shows a commencement speaker at a podium under a Class of 2026 banner. Graduates in blue gowns and caps sit in rows. One speech bubble reads the setup about the future given by elders and three words coming to mind. The second bubble states we are toast. Visible elements include microphone, stage, and bottom left signature area with cagle.com/plante.
On February 22, 2026, a political cartoon depicts Chief Justice John Roberts striking Donald Trump with a gavel. The image references a recent 6-3 Supreme Court ruling limiting presidential trade powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act amid multiple lawsuits.
This biting political cartoon by Michael de Adder captures Donald Trump in a childish tantrum, holding and firing a diminutive Kirstjen Nielsen as an ICE agent clutching a separated baby, symbolizing the border crisis and family separation policies. The image skewers the Trump administration's immigration policy failures, with Trump shifting blame for the humanitarian mess at the US border. Through exaggerated caricature, it highlights themes of accountability, political satire, and the human cost of harsh enforcement, making it a viral-worthy jab at leadership in US politics.
